Climategate II: Emails Provide Early Christmas for Manmade Global Warming Deniers

Sometimes the holiday season does come early. For the Green Grinches intent on stealing our freedom, along with a whole lot of our dough, a bevy of swiped emailgifts being dubbed Climategate II released near midnight the 21st promise a different kind of Cyber Monday for the multi-billion dollar climate fraud industry.

Among the Who-pudding and roast beast is a feast of political-scientific incest exposing the lucrative business of warm-mongering. The examples are many, but a sit down with a cup of coffee and an eye to examining the political assumptions behind the climate “science” can be revelatory for even the non-specialist (like all of those lawyers and rights activists who participated in the first IPCC).

Continued at Rogue Government.

About these ads


Categories: World Events

8 replies

  1. LONDON — The British university whose stolen emails caused a global climate science controversy in 2009 says those behind the breach have apparently released a second and potentially far larger batch of old messages.

    University of East Anglia spokesman Simon Dunford said that while academics didn’t yet have the chance to examine all the roughly 5,000 emails apparently dumped into the public domain Tuesday, a small sample seen by the university “appears to be genuine.”

    The university said in a statement that the emails did not appear to be the result of a new breach. Instead, the statement said that the emails appeared to have been stolen two years ago and held back until now “to cause maximum disruption” to the imminent U.N. climate talks next week in Durban, South Africa.

    If that is confirmed, the timing and nature of the leak would follow the pattern set by the so-called “Climategate” emails, which caught prominent scientists stonewalling critics and discussing ways to keep opponents’ research out of peer-reviewed journals.

    Those hostile to mainstream climate science claimed the exchanges proved that the threat of global warming was being hyped, and their publication helped destabilize the failed U.N. climate talks in Copenhagen, Denmark, which followed several weeks later.

    Climategate also dealt a blow to the reputation of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit, which is one of the world’s leading centers for the study of how world temperatures have varied over time.

    Although a host of reviews have since vindicated the unit’s science, some of its practices – in particular efforts to hide data from opponents – have come under strong criticism. The university says it is now much more open about what it does.

    Excerpts quoted on climate skeptic websites appeared to show climate scientists talking in conspiratorial tones about ways to promote their agenda and freeze out those they disagree with. There are several mentions of “the cause” and discussions of ways to shield emails from freedom of information requests.

    Penn State University professor Michael Mann – a prominent player in the earlier controversy whose name also appears in the latest leak – said on Twitter that “the cause” he was referring to was the cause of “communicating science in face of massive disinformation effort.”

    In an email exchange with the AP he described Tuesday’s development as “a truly pathetic episode,” blaming agents of the fossil fuel industry for “smear, innuendo, criminal hacking of websites, and leaking out-of-context snippets of personal emails.”

    He said that the real story behind the leak was “an attempt to dig out 2-year-old turkey from Thanksgiving ’09. That’s how desperate climate change deniers have become.”

    Bob Ward, with the London School of Economics’ Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change, said in an email that he wasn’t surprised by the leak.

    “The selective presentation of old email messages is clearly designed to mislead the public and politicians about the strength of the evidence for man-made climate change,” he said. “But the fact remains that there is very strong evidence that most the indisputable warming of the Earth over the past half century is due to the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities.”

    The source of the latest leaked emails was unclear. The perpetrator of the original hack has yet to be unmasked, although British police have said their investigation is still active.

    ___

    Associated Press Writers Jill Lawless in London, Malcolm Ritter in New York, and Seth Borenstein in Washington contributed to this report.

  2. Yup, and lots more remain to be released, which the climate conspirators and their schools are struggling to head off. Climategate is raining on their parade with Chinese water torture dripping rather than a deluge; harder to manage and more destructive to the conspiracy. Clay feet extending to the hips look pretty bad on prophets…

    But isn’t the politicization of science a larger story–and problem–than climategate? We’ve relied on our scientists as truth seekers, forgetting that they’re just people too. And now we see government corrupting a whole group of them, but we haven’t yet figured out that it’s not a unique case,,,it goes on all the time, just as with education, health care and everything else fueled by government. Or so it seems to me!

    • Wow Jack, you missed the obvious once again. The stolen emails from two years ago did not show falsehoods in the data, these left over stolen emails show even less.

      Even Muller, the former denier, has released his Koch financed studies showing that the previous data was correct. As you say, he is human…and admitted his error(s).

      • Wow Jack, you missed the obvious once again. The stolen emails from two years ago did not show falsehoods in the data, these left over stolen emails show even less.

        What they show is scientists doing their job – questioning the reliability of their data and asking ‘what ifs”. That’s science.

  3. “That is science.” Indeed; and a shame that it has to, in this case, be conducted by leaking emails since too much of the data is otherwise restricted from general availability.

    I note that the motto: “Trust me” is normally displayed under the image of a top predator rather than any sort of scientist….

    The data available are already challenged from outside the circle of conspirators; the emails provide the participants’ discussions of the conspiracy. Famously, “Hide the decline” from the earlier e-mail dump.

  4. “That is science.” Indeed;

    Yup. As opposed to vague innuendo from right-wing nutters, which is not science.

    Or did you think we hadn’t noticed that you haven’t, you know, actually quoted anything in all your spluttering?

    • If you investigate, you’ll find: “Hide the decline” is indeed a quote, from one of the first set of emails. The measurements showed a decline in temperature where the conspirators didn’t want a decline to show…

  5. If you investigate, you’ll find: “Hide the decline” is indeed a quote, from one of the first set of emails.

    You mean that first set that had seven different investigations done on them, all finding the claims bogus?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,137 other followers

%d bloggers like this: