About these ads

Demoralization in America: The Separation of Means & Ends

The country is in moral crisis. The great majority of citizens appear to be aware of the dire situation, even if they do not recognize it in such terms. They may feel powerless to change the cultural decay or that they have no recourse but to pray for the fate of the country. But a fundamental understanding of the ideological and political sources of our nation’s demoralization would do much to empower a counter-movement dedicated to preserving American values and defeating their opponents.

A radical minority desires social breakdown as an opportunity to promote its leftward political agenda. It is hard for most Americans to contemplate why a sizable number of their fellow citizens would seek to purposefully throw the country into tumult. Many commonly give the left too much credit for noble intentions, such as aiding the poor, protecting the helpless, and defending supposed victims. There may be many people who vote Democrat who have such admirable aims, but they do not have a deep enough appreciation for the moral means of advancing these worthy goals.

One of the best ways to understand radical leftists is to know what they know and to read whom they admire. Two main sources that are easily readable are Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, and just as tellingly, Reveille for Radicals. Both were influential in molding the thinking of the left’s top leadership; namely, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Alinsky took leftist activists to task for respecting moral means to attain moral ends, such as assisting the poor and helpless. But even more dangerously, Alinsky taught that power is an end in itself.

The separation of moral means and ends has been devastating for American life. Agitation, demoralization, and deception have all become legitimate means in the opinion of the left to promote the radical agenda. If that propels the nation into crisis, so be it. As Hillary Clinton put it in regards to the chimera of climate change, “Never waste a good crisis.” Rahm Emanuel, the former chief of staff for Obama and current Mayor of Chicago, once said, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste.” It is not a stretch to argue that such people desire a crisis to advance the leftist agenda, which in the minds of our present radicals requires statist means.

Continued at Conservative Daily News.

About these ads


Categories: World Events

8 replies

  1. I’ll have to read the rest of this later, but the whole bit about good intentions – the path to Hell is paved with them. It always SOUNDS good, but I’ve found that there isn’t much thinking through, as if even the math professors in my neighborhood didn’t learn the thought processing taught in high school Algebra and Trig. There also is not much thinking about the human element from liberals. Ever. I’ve run into that just with doing event registration and trying to explain that too many options invites trouble. Yes, our system of government and culture requires a moral society to function, but moral is not the default human state. Neither is thinking things through, it seems. That’s why God sent us His only son and had Moses carry huge pieces of rock down the mountain. It’s when all of THAT is rejected, even in pieces and parts, that we start to get into trouble – and not just liberals.

  2. Excellent and to the point. I think that the Marxist police state is already in place and waiting patiently for the political system to change.

    • I’m glad people comment that I get to the point. Although sometimes I can’t resist the temptation to use high-fallutin’ language, that is how I express how I feel and think (if that makes any sense). It is also because I can’t stand when lefties dismiss conservatives as stupid. Our positions are much better thought-out than the left’s. Anyway, let me know what you think: Should I write intuitively, which usually has more energy, or should I write for clarity, which is usually more accessible?

  3. West Texas View — I, too, edit, edit, and then edit some more before publishing. Sometimes, I think the more passionate and knowledgeable we are about our topic, the more we forget to bring our readers up to speed with our thinking. I’ve found over and over again that re-reading a post with fresh eyes almost always reveals a point that could use some clearing up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,243 other followers

%d bloggers like this: