Florida: Yeah, We Think Asian Students Are Smarter Than Black Students, What’s The Problem?

FLORIDA PLANS TO MEASURE STUDENT SUCCESS – BY RACE
The soft bigotry of lower expectations? 

Florida educators have come up with a new policy for setting educational standards for students based on their various comprehension levels. Well, not exactly. Actually – it’s based on race. Nothing could go wrong with that brilliant idea, right? Hell no.

By 2018, Florida’s Department of Education wants 90% of its Asian students to be reading at or above grade level, compared to 88% of white students, 81% of Hispanic students and 74% of black students. In math, state educational officials want that figure to be 92% for Asians, which is 11% higher than for native Americans and 18% higher than for blacks.

In case you have any doubt, of course that’s racism – as defined by Merriam-Webster:

A belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities; and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race. A racial prejudice or discrimination.

What the hell is wrong with these people?

This ill-advised policy would only serve to reinforce stereotypes - not only in how one races views another, but in how each race views itself, as well. Implicitly telling Asian students: “We think you’re smarter than everyone else.” Seriously? We want one race of students in our schools believing it’s superior to all others? Hell – why shouldn’t it if the educational system tells them as much?

Conversely, telling black students: “We’re going to give “you people” the biggest break of all – because we just don’t think you have the mental capacity to measure up to the whites and Asians.” Nothing can go wrong there, huh? While I’m sure you’d have a few lazy black students who’d welcome the policy – which you would have in any race - or group – for which you set lower standards – what does this lowering of the bar say to the hardworking black student? What does it say to black parents?

While students of varying aptitudes have been properly placed in various groups for decades – advanced classes, slow readers, etc. – a blanket policy of creating groups based solely on skin color – and lowering or raising expectations for each of those groups depending on the color of their skin is an admission that Florida’s public school system has failed. Does it lack the ability to educate students as individuals - and as a consequence, reduces itself to throwing them in to racial groups and setting expectations based on its failed results of the past?

It certainly appears so. According to state statistics, 69% of white students in Florida scored at or above grade level in reading during the 2011-2012 school year, compared to 53% of Hispanic students and 38% of blacks.

So, Florida’s public education system decided that the most effective way to reduce or eliminate these variances is to reinforce them by lowering expectations for blacks and Hispanics – not to mention their teachers. I’m sure the unions – NEA and FEA – love it.

What will be the consequences of this discriminatory policy when Florida’s black students leave school and enter the work place? Will standards be lowered – just for them – in their jobs or careers? Will they be paid the same salaries, bonuses or commissions for doing less work? Will they advance in those jobs based on goals and objectives that are lower for them than for employees of other races? The answer to all four questions is obvious: Hell, no.  

As a result, by programming black students to believe that less is more, or at least “equal”, Florida’s public education system will fail black students profoundly in preparing them for the real world. Call it the law of unintended consequences if you’d like, but in reality – it’s racism of the worst kind; racism that will most likely be embraced by a majority of Florida’s black population.

What’s next, Florida – revisitation of the argument for teaching Ebonics?

Separate but equal is not equal.

About these ads


Categories: Education, Liberal Lunacy, Planet Obama, Race, Racism

Tags: , ,

3 replies

  1. Well, let’s take a look. Dunno, but suppose those differing percentages by race represent the actual, historical results of presenting the same program to those different races? You can’t call that racism; it’s what the students did on their own, unless you can show they were treated differently somehow.
    Then suppose the schools were frowned on because there was a single level of attainment their students had to meet…call it ‘no student left behind’ maybe? And too many students didn’t meet it. Mostly failing if they were black, then Hispanic, etc. The schools might feel punished by having too many blacks and Hispanics under such a regime, no? And look for some bureaucratic solution?

    I’d call Florida ingenious and honest. Requiring schools to attain identical results from different populations in the name of a non-existent equality seems to me both unfair and worse, unreal. Perhaps Florida is pointing to that?

    • Respectfully, Jack, you’re wrong; racism need not necessarily be treating someone differently NEGATIVELY based solely on race,

      And – I wouldn’t call setting lower expectations for one race vs. another “ingenious” – particularly given that the world after school will not do so.

      • Well, I appreciate the respect;; I don’t get that so much when my wife or kids explain how wrong I am..

        But the concern is whether Florida is wrong. Kindly consider:
        1. Federal law punishes schools with too many kids testing at low proficiency.
        2. Proficiency test results nationwide come out at race-based levels, with blacks the lowest.
        3. Therefore, schools with ‘too many’ blacks will be punished.

        Seems to me, the Federal law that does that is wrong and Florida is right to game the system, thereby protecting its schools from what seems unfair punishment.

        The two separate subjects of low performance by government clients such as blacks, Indians and “Hispanics” (mostly Indians) and the abysmal public schools are,to me, an entirely different matter…upon which I suspect we will mostly agree.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,151 other followers

%d bloggers like this: