About these ads

Democrat Congressman: Banning Post-Five-Month Abortion Is ‘Morally Outrageous’

12small

Reprehensible Immoral Jackass Rep. Jerrald Nadler (D-N.Y.) said today that it is “morally outrageous” to ban abortions after five months of pregnancy. Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi seen furiously nodding in approval. No response yet from post-five-month-old aborted babies.

“It is morally outrageous, frankly,” Nadler said about the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 1797), a bill that would ban abortions 20 weeks post-fertilization, or five months into pregnancy.

“Here we go again,. Every single year we have to go through the same nonsense with the same morally presumptuous, morally arrogant attitude that we know better. ‘We know better than women and their doctors. We know better about their health care. We know better about their moral choices in very personal decisions.’

Memo to vacuous moron: Nonsense? Arrogance? Moral choices? Personal decisions? Who the hell are you – or anyone who agrees with you – to preach to us – and the nation’s unborn children – about morals?

Nadler said Republicans pushing the bill are “morally arrogant people” who have “decided that their moral outlooks are more important” than a woman’s health.

Memo to vacuous moron 2.0: Please explain how infanticide protects “a woman’s health”, you incredible imbecile.

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) agreed with Nadler, saying a decision to have an abortion after five months should belong to women “and perhaps their spouses.”

“It’s the same Republican men who say that the reach of government is just too great, who want to reach right inside women’s bodies and decide what they should do, what we should do, the kinds of decisions that should only belong to women and their doctors and perhaps their spouses.”

Memo to second vacuous moron: I realize that the baby could possibly be in the minority here, but shouldn’t he/she still have a vote, “perhaps”? Oh, and that silly “Republican men” blast is ridiculous; tens of millions of “Republican women” abhor the murder of unborn children too, you moron.

Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), sponsored the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act in the wake of the Kermit Gosnell trial in Philadelphia, a late-term abortionist convicted of killing three babies who survived abortions outside of the womb, by cutting their spinal cords with scissors.

Franks argued that babies past 20 weeks gestation have the ability to feel pain, and thus abortions at this stage should be outlawed.

“The trial of Kermit Gosnell exposed late abortions for what they really are: relocated infanticide. I pray we use this as a ‘teachable moment,’ in the words of President Obama, and can agree that, at the very least, we are better than dismembering babies who can feel every excruciating moment.”

While the abortion debate will most likely go on for eternity, the Gosnell trial has brought to light the ugly side of the debate: “Progressive” liberals will defend the killing of unborn children until the very end. Even if some of them must be killed after they’re born.

About these ads


Categories: Abortion, Liberals

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

6 replies

  1. Said Congresscritter wouldn’t recognize a moral that lit up in front of him in the moral dark he inhabits. If killing babies for convenience is ok, when you do it is irrelevant. If it’s not ok, when you do it is still irrelevant. Setting a time limit simply establishes a legal hunting season nascent people. Much like Obama does on adults with drones…

  2. It really is amazing how barbaric a “civilized” nation can be….

  3. The sad truth Dave, is that the White people of America have been killing and destroying all life on this continent and planet, for as long as America has been a country. Look what they did to the Native Americans, and all the other countries of the world through Wars and all sorts of other devices.

    The Evil of the world is enjoying all this.

    • Well, killing is hardly confined to the white race. Savagery is not bound by race. Horrible slaughters and bloodythirsty civilizations were common in the New World far before the white man arrived. The conquistadors discovered barbaric practices, horrendous tortures, and mass sacrifices in Central and South America that appalled even them. And they were no saints.

      • i know your right Dave, but even the Spaniards are of Caucasian race if you think about it. Not that it matters, People have been having bloody battles forever. You would think that being Civilized would mean something, but it doesn’t does it.

        I watched a movie called Clash of the Titans, and in Mythology, even the gods have been a bloody bunch. I’m sure I will get into trouble here, but if being alive means get used to all the blood shed, then I would rather not even exist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,793 other followers

%d bloggers like this: